Links and Stuff
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Add to the above list if you can, thank you.
Resources For Understanding The War Beyond The Bulletins
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map, who is an independent youtuber with a mostly neutral viewpoint.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have good analysis (though also a couple bad takes here and there)
Understanding War and the Saker: neo-conservative sources but their reporting of the war (so far) seems to line up with reality better than most liberal sources.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict and, unlike most western analysts, has some degree of understanding on how war works. He is a reactionary, however.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent journalist reporting in the Ukrainian warzones.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Telegram Channels
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
Pro-Russian
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ Gleb Bazov, banned from Twitter, referenced pretty heavily in what remains of pro-Russian Twitter.
https://t.me/asbmil ~ ASB Military News, banned from Twitter.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday Patrick Lancaster - crowd-funded U.S journalist, mostly pro-Russian, works on the ground near warzones to report news and talk to locals.
https://t.me/riafan_everywhere ~ Think it's a government news org or Federal News Agency? Russian language.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ Front news coverage. Russian langauge.
https://t.me/rybar ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine
With the entire western media sphere being overwhelming pro-Ukraine already, you shouldn't really need more, but:
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Yesterday's discussion post.
no way the ukrainians have lost 62.5k so far. i think about 20k is most likely. i'd assume that 28% figure for foreign fighters is heavily inflated relative to the ukrainian loss percentage - they're more likely to be involved in the nastiest fighting, they're probably more ok with dying in combat (i mean, if you're willing to travel across the world to fight for a shitty country like ukraine, then you probs don't have much on the line to live for), and it seems like a not-insignificant portion of them give away their position by posting about it and get themselves killed.
The Azovstal situation had a claimed 2400~ fighters get captured that would've been 12% of their entire losses if it were only 20k but even so let's just say they've lost only 20k that's 200 people getting eliminated (that means people getting wounded, killed, captured or surrendering) they still jumped from that low number to now 1000 people a day. My point isn't that they've lost a lot of people but that they are rapidly losing more and more people at some point you run the risk of running out of people that can instruct people to fight.
where are you seeing 1000 deaths per day?
https://tass.com/defense/1465843
https://www.axios.com/2022/06/15/ukraine-1000-casualties-day-donbas-arakhamia
that's 1000 casualties, not deaths. 200-500 deaths per day according to that second one.
I never said deaths? I said 1000 eliminated, i.e. taken out of action, i.e. killed, wounded, captured or surrender, eliminated means out of the fight, captured people don't fight for the ukr army anymore, for the ukranian army it doesn't matter if someone gets killed, wounded or captured because to them it's all the same, it's one soldier less you can throw at the russian army.
Edit: should also add this of course also means people that have fled the whole conflict
oh, fair, i see.
20k? You’re joking. It was over 30k back in April
if it was over 30k in april then the ukrainian army would literally not exist as a fighting force at this point. that claim is as ridiculous as the kinda absurd shit the ukrainian gov has claimed about russia's losses - you're talking greater loss rates, adjusted for the size of military theatre, than any major conflict since WW2, in a war which has been less intense than that conflict in every way.
Russian clobber list had 30k casualties in April and they have been roughly accurate thus far. Casualties, not deaths
Pretty sure Ukraine had 150k in the regular army at the start of the war without conscripts. 30k is not really that much considering.