I have pondered for a week about how I'm going to cover world events and especially this war in the long term, without losing my mind (and a significant amount of time on my behalf) staring into the abyss that is modern-day journalism.

My solution, so far, is what you can see. The update itself and the summary have performed a fusion dance, becoming a single entity (who even reads thousands of words almost every day just for news?). Only the headlines will be posted, except when a short excerpt from the article is particularly good at summarizing the article's contents (or when the article has a clickbaity headline). To save character space, all links to media will be archived, except for a few special cases like blogs (e.g. Michael Roberts, Naked Capitalism), instead of just the more MSM-y sites.

To the loyal people with attention spans of steel who have been here since the beginning, back when the war looked like it would be over before the first leaves started falling off the trees - yes, I agree, it does look frighteningly similar to what I initially did before the bulletins site was a thing. Just with a different categorization system. Time is a flat circle, after all.

Anyway:

November 21st's update is here on the website and here in the comment section!

November 22nd's update is here on the website and here in the comment section!

November 23rd's update is here on the website and here in the comment section!

November 25th's update is here on the website and here in the comment section!

November 26th's update is here on the website and here in the comment section!

Links and Stuff

Want to contribute?

RSS Feed

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can, thank you.


Resources For Understanding The War Beyond The Bulletins


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. I recommend their map more than the channel at this point, as an increasing subscriber count has greatly diminished their quality.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have good analysis (though also a couple bad takes here and there)

Understanding War and the Saker: neo-conservative sources but their reporting of the war (so far) seems to line up with reality better than most liberal sources. Beware of chuddery.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are fairly brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. The Duran, of which he co-hosts, is where the chuddery really begins to spill out.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent journalist reporting in the Ukrainian warzones.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ Gleb Bazov, banned from Twitter, referenced pretty heavily in what remains of pro-Russian Twitter.

https://t.me/asbmil ~ Now rebranded as Battlefield Insights, they do infrequent posts on the conflict.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/riafan_everywhere ~ Think it's a government news org or Federal News Agency? Russian language.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ Front news coverage. Russian langauge.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of the really big pro-Russian (except when they're being pessismistic, which is often) telegram channels focussing on the war. Russian language.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Any Western media outlet that is even vaguely liberal (and quite a few conservative ones too).

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • iridaniotter [they/them]
    hexbear
    69
    1 year ago

    IDK if there have been any posts on this site regarding Ghana & Cote d'Ivoire standing up against European chocolate companies, so I am going to post about it here.

    These two countries produce a huge portion of the world's cocoa - about 60% altogether - but the overwhelming majority of this is sold to companies mostly in Europe that process it into chocolate. Most of the value in chocolate comes from the processing. The result is your typical neocolonial situation - wealth gets siphoned to the imperialist core, farmers in the exploited countries remain poor, and industrial development of these countries is slow or stagnant. You also end up with a perverse reality where many cocoa farmers have never eaten chocolate.

    In order to improve the conditions of cocoa farmers, Ghana and Cote d'Ivoire introduced the Living Income Differential (LID) in 2019. This was a $400/tonne surcharge on cocoa exports that would go towards farmers. In October this year, Ghanaian cocoa farmers were enrolled into a pension plan as a result. Unsurprisingly, cocoa trade journals and bourgeois newspapers like Bloomberg have called it a failure. In reality, it is having trouble because there is another premium based on bean quality called the origin differential. This premium has fallen a lot in recent years, which lowers the price of cocoa and negates the LID. In fact this premium has gone negative in these two countries and some Europeans want it to be -$236 per tonne. So on July 29 the producer countries stated they won't sell cocoa at negative origin differentials (specifically, no less than $0 in Cote d'Ivoire and no less than $23 in Ghana). I'm not exactly sure why the premium has gone down so much, but Ghana and Cote d'Ivoire say that quality hasn't diminished and European companies are fibbing. That's not hard to believe.

    Also in October, Nigeria and Cameroon expressed interest in joining a cocoa trade alliance with Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana. I don't think there's been any further development since then but it's only been a month. There was also a World Cocoa Foundation at the end of the month that Ghana and Cote d'Ivoire boycotted, telling buyers to get their act together by November 20 or else they would prevent European companies from visiting cocoa farms and suspend programs that these chocolate companies use to paint themselves as sustainable. So it's now the 21st and there is a communique by Ghanaian and Ivorian cocoa organizations stating that progress is being made and there will be a report in Q1 of next year. Yeah, not the most exciting conclusion but this stuff happens pretty slowly!

    It's important to keep in mind that this struggle over cocoa prices is only part of a larger neocolonial struggle. First, relating to cocoa exports - the EU threatened to ban cocoa from the two countries in 2021 due to land degradation, showcasing how the west exploits sustainability concerns to further their imperialist ambitions. Of course this would have screwed over European chocolate companies too, which is maybe why it never happened. Second, although the LID is a good development for cocoa farmers and national sovereignty, it does not challenge the extractivist nature of neocolonialism. Ghana is working on this as well and has had a state-owned (I think) manufacturer of chocolate for a while, but they are trying to ramp up that industry. The Deputy CEO of Ghana's export promotion authority has stated his desire for every Ghanaian to taste chocolate and for the country to export chocolate to the world. Ghana is one of the states trying to establish a west African currency, so France definitely has an interest in the obliteration of Ghana's and Cote d'Ivoire's ambitions. Third, Ghana used to be a major gold ore exporter but in recent years built refineries to process their own gold and improve their position in the gold trade. The Bank of Ghana is also increasing their gold reserves. Recently, Ghana has been hit hard by inflation, the IMF wants to do its thing cause Ghana keeps borrowing from them, and has had its credit rating decreased.

    • iridaniotter [they/them]
      hexbear
      43
      1 year ago

      Also, mostly unrelated to the Europe-West Africa cocoa conflict, but worth mentioning: In 2021, China sold its first batch of cocoa grown in Hainan. Suitable land for cocoa is more limited in China than Africa, but it's still a concerning development for cocoa farmers in Africa and another reason why agriculture and industry needs to modernize there.

    • Coolkidbozzy [he/him]
      hexbear
      36
      1 year ago

      Wait, Europe wants the ivory coast to pay THEM for the export of cocoa?

      • iridaniotter [they/them]
        hexbear
        28
        1 year ago

        Not quite. That (negative) premium is added on top of the sale price. So if cocoa beans are $3,000 per tonne on the market, Cote d'Ivoire would have to sell for $2800 ish. Don't want to bother with math sorry lol.

    • SoyViking [he/him]
      hexbear
      35
      1 year ago

      I think that one about the EU threatening to ban cocoa from the two countries only to back down because that would hurt their own chocolate industry (and piss off the public by raising prices for consumers) is an interesting development that kind of sort of looks a little like the sanctions on Russia backfiring. It's not the 1990's anymore and the imperial core can't do economic terrorism to the periphery the way it used to, as the rise of BRICS means the emergence of a viable alternative to taking orders from the west. You can't really sanction anyone but yourself in a multipolar world.

    • goatmeal [none/use name]
      hexbear
      7
      1 year ago

      I watch CGTN Chinese news and these African countries are totally good with the Chinese form of neocolonialism because it's a better deal for the Africans than 20th century European colonialism