Very slight change of plans: I'll begin the updates next Monday instead of this Friday. So this week will have no updates. Dang. So y'all better post hard enough to make up for it. But not so hard that we get past 1000 comments by the end of the week.

Links and Stuff

Want to contribute?

RSS Feed

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists, for the “buh Zeleski is a jew?!?!” people.

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can, thank you.


Resources For Understanding The War Beyond The Bulletins


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map, who is an independent youtuber with a mostly neutral viewpoint.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have good analysis (though also a couple bad takes here and there)

Understanding War and the Saker: neo-conservative sources but their reporting of the war (so far) seems to line up with reality better than most liberal sources.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict and, unlike most western analysts, has some degree of understanding on how war works. He is a reactionary, however.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent journalist reporting in the Ukrainian warzones.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ Gleb Bazov, banned from Twitter, referenced pretty heavily in what remains of pro-Russian Twitter.

https://t.me/asbmil ~ ASB Military News, banned from Twitter.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday Patrick Lancaster - crowd-funded U.S journalist, mostly pro-Russian, works on the ground near warzones to report news and talk to locals.

https://t.me/riafan_everywhere ~ Think it's a government news org or Federal News Agency? Russian language.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ Front news coverage. Russian langauge.

https://t.me/rybar ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

With the entire western media sphere being overwhelming pro-Ukraine already, you shouldn't really need more, but:

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]
    hexagon
    M
    hexbear
    37
    2 years ago

    The concept is pretty simple, you just collect your uranium from your nuclear power plants (and Ukraine has a few), put a bunch of explosives together with it, and blow it up. Basically any country that has nuclear power plants could make one if they so desired.

    My guess as to why this hasn't happened before is that a) not every country has nuclear power plants, particularly underdeveloped ones; b) many terrorist groups have some connection to intelligence agencies, and even the really cynical ones like the CIA that want to generate terrorism to guarantee they have jobs and can put fear into the population probably don't wanna deal with radioactive fallout; and c) it's gotta be pretty difficult to get radioactive materials into countries, because these things are quite tightly controlled especially across borders, and getting enough explosives together for a big enough bomb would also be tricky.

    • TheCaconym [any]
      hexbear
      30
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      My own reasoning has always included as well that d) it's a fucking waste of radioactive materials and wouldn't do much. It does seem like the perfect shitty idea some fucked up psycho would come up with in DC though, particularly as a weird way to shout "nuclear threat" against Russia without actually detonating a nuke, which stills frightens the shit out of everyone.

    • FloridaBoi [he/him]
      hexbear
      14
      2 years ago

      tbh option C is the likely reason just because it's the simplest. also radioactive materials are likely reasonably tightly controlled (at least more so than explosive precursors) so the source may/would be quickly found out so an entire supply chain might get outed.